Tag Archives: writing

HOW WRITERS REAP THE HARVEST OF THEIR LIVES

14 Nov

I’ve spent my career as a fresh-faced reporter, a travelling correspondent, an editor, and as an executive responsible for huge media companies. I enjoyed it, and learned a lot; but what I didn’t realise until recently was something else it was training me to be.

I had already written a memoir called The Bootle Boy and the research had been easy. I wrote about my life and experiences in chronological order, looking back now and then at old diaries, calendars, and newspaper clippings to check my memory.

After that, I wanted to try fiction, which is a whole other thing, and, I discovered, much more difficult. 

Thinking up the story; inventing characters; developing the rise, fall, and climax of the story. All this turned out to be far more difficult than I had dreamed.

But what I hadn’t realised was how built-up lessons of my life would help rescue me.

Writers of fiction, as many readers here will be aware, depend heavily on their lived experience. That’s what feeds their imagination. To give their work authenticity, they infuse what they write with the true dreads and joys of the life they’ve lived. Not literally, of course, but to summon the glowing moments of happiness they have known; or the sadness of a loved one’s death; the romance gone wrong; the betrayal of someone you trusted, and to use their imagination to apply these experiences to create wonderful and terrifying moments in their fiction. 

The richness of a life, linked with a fertile imagination, is the foundation of all fiction. I can imagine the above words will be like teaching some of you to suck eggs. But I’m new at this and want to go on to explain what it means to me; how a life face to face with the extreme tragedy and beauty of human existence can be a treasure for a writer.

Let me tell about someone who has seen the highest and lowest of life:

He has been with lottery winners celebrating their millions; with the destitute and homeless and drug addicted; sat in court as a black-capped judge delivered the sentence of death.

He has stood by the piled-up, rotting corpses of massacred women and children in a war zone; walked through the horrifying remains of what was the world’s worst air disaster; survived an IRA bomb.

He has been drunk in a Manhattan punk bar with Johnny Rotten; received a playful punch in the stomach from Paul McCartney; made the late Queen Elizabeth laugh at his jokes.

He has met presidents and prime ministers; stared from two feet away into the cold eyes of Benjamin Netanyahu, sat alone with an anguished Tony Blair as he prepared to send his country to war; been the object one-to-one of the overwhelming persuasive power of Margaret Thatcher; and a victim of the easy, body-pressing charm of Bill Clinton.

He has worked in the fantasy world of Hollywood among the movie stars and egocentric moguls. Sat at a breakfast cafe next to Stephen Spielberg; watched Meryl Streep stroll by with a baby on her hip; lived next door to O J Simpson at the time he may, or may not, have murdered his wife and her lover.

This someone I’m writing about, you will have guessed, is me and that list represents a fraction of the life I’ve lived. It’s part of the inventory of my life and a treasure that means I should never run out of the ideas a fiction writer needs.

I’m not the first journalist inthis position: Ernest Hemingway, Evelyn Waugh, Geraldine Brooks, Michael Frayn, Frederick Forsyth . . . I could go on, there are many more, and I’m definitely not comparing myself with all that brilliance.

My point is that, if you’re a journalist long enough, all human life will pass your way. Some of it is tough, unbearable sometimes and the stuff of terrible dreams, but, boy oh boy, it’s great raw material if you want to write fiction.

My book Dying Days (Whitefox, $9.99 on sale here https://mybook.tMyDyingDaysbooko/ ) is about the dying days of newspapers and a mysterious group intent on the murder of Press barons and their editors.

It is entirely fictitious, more or less. There’s a prime minister who “no matter how serious things were, a perpetual expression of amused indifference seemed to play on his face.” But it’s not Boris Johnson. This PM bites his fingernails; but it’s not Gordon Brown.

There’s a nonagenarian Press baron and “all the stresses and strains and dirty tricks of his long life were carved deep into his war-torn face” … but it’s definitely not my old boss Rupert Murdoch, far from it.

There’s another Press baron who’s “a caricature of his bawdy newspapers . . . an alien life form unreached by everyone else’s ideas of civility and social convention.” Well, I admit having Robert Maxwell in mind when writing that.

There are many the other characters, foul and fine people, and I know there’ll be others who’ll say of them “ah, that’s so and so.” But they’ll never be right, not completely

 It’s almost all made up. None of it is absolutely true. But it does draw from the rich harvest of the life I’ve had.

THE TRUST HUNT

17 Oct

I spent much of yesterday on Manhattan’s West Side, where a hundred or so media types gathered to discuss The Future of News. It was a glitzy event staged by Stagwell, one of the more forward-thinking marketing outfits, and happened at a place called Lavan Midtown. It was an appropriate setting— so futuristic, with its white walls in permanent motion, swimming with happy colours alongside the brand names of participants: NBC, The Financial Times, Axel Springer, Gannett, Axios . . . 

 I have some thoughts about the event, and then a confession

The sessions were headlined with the usual upbeat, somehow meaningless, titles:

REBOOTING THE NEWS PRODUCT FOR THE NEXT GENERATION

TURNING ATTENTION INTO IMPACT

Eager speakers hopped around the stage, ticking off their farseeing ideas and innovations, all of them delivered with a blizzard of jargon and hardly a blink of doubt. We heard about the magic of new technology and the still unmeasured wonders and possible dangers of AI. It was impossible to know which of these dazzling blueprints for the future might work best. 

The striking thing for me, amid the non-stop waves of bright-eyed optimism, was a word that echoed through the whole day.

TRUST

Speaker after speaker repeated this word, though mainly to emphasize the “trust” they claimed for their particular brands.

No one mentioned that the news media is suffering a famine of trust; that a Gallup poll was released only two weeks ago showing that trust in mass news media is plunging; that in the 1970s it was at 70 percent of the population and had now plunged to a mere 28 percent. 

That’s easy to understand, put in the context of a world flooded daily through social media with a crazy avalanche of lies and conspiracy theories; when a huge percentage of young people rely on unmonitored posts for their “news”; when powerful people pour scorn on the traditional media. It’s a truism that lies repeated again and again can turn into truth in the heads of many.

The man from Axel Springer said it best yesterday: “Misinformation spreads faster than the truth.”

That’s not a new thought . . . Jonathan Swift said the same thing more poetically: “Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late.”

Swift wrote those words more than three hundred years ago, when print was a wonder of the world, so it’s not a new problem. But he could never have imagined today’s unending torrent of deceit.

Healthy societies are held together by a chain of trust and forbearance, the readiness to tolerate their differences. This chain can be threatened by mad and malign liars, especially when those liars include people in positions of great power.

I have spent decades in the news industry and left that meeting with feelings of hope and apprehension. Hope that their rosy plans bear fruit for them all, that they can rebuild the trust in their truth; and apprehension at the formidable hurdles awaiting them.

Finally, my confession. I have spent decades in the news business and cannot count the number of events such as this that I have been required to sit through. I remember in the mid-1990s, when one presenter spoke with such shining confidence about the durable future of printed newspapers that the audience cheered him.

That speaker was me, so I know what it’s like to get it wrong.

*I’m about to publish a novel, Dying Days, that imagines the catastrophic consequences of growing antagonism towards news media. It’s far-fetched fiction, I hope, although the author Jeffrey Archer read it and wrote “it’s an original story told with frightening conviction . . . Could it happen?” ORDER ON AMAZON NOW

THE COMEDY THAT’S TOO TRUE TO BE FUNNY

26 Sep

There’s a new comedy streaming on Peacock that doesn’t make me laugh. It’s too true to be funny.
It’s called The Paper and it’s about a newspaper. The unfunny twist is that it’s about a typical local newspaper in the 21st century.
One of the first things you learn in this show is that this newspaper is housed in a magnificent building in Toledo, Ohio, with its name engraved in huge letters on the wall above the grand entrance — The Toledo Truth Teller.
Then you discover that the miserable remains of The Truth Teller are crammed into a few square feet of this vast building. All The Truth Teller’s grandeur is lost; the rest of the building is occupied by the paper’s new corporate owner, which makes its real money selling . . . toilet paper. To double up on that belly laugh, the idealistic new editor-in-chief arrives in the office after quitting his previous job. He was a toilet paper salesman.
The only real journalist on the Truth Teller is a young woman who spends her life staring at a screen to cut and paste agency copy into the paper. The ad sales guy and the office bean counter are sent into the streets in desperate hunts for local news. There’s a click-bait editor putting up stories like You’ll Never Guess How Much Liam Neeson Tipped His Chauffeur. This scoop arrives online, a couple of sentences at a time, between endless ads, before the breathless moment arrives when the amount is revealed.
Everyone reading this who has lived with newspapers knows what I’m writing about and understands how painful it is to watch. The Paper is an only slightly satirical picture of the real circumstances facing hundreds of local newspapers — those, that is, that still survive in a changing world.
The Paper does dig up some real humor at the expense of the depressing truth that newspapers are a vanishing thing. A lot of newspaper people — Brits at least — laugh in the way their parents and grandparents found humor in the Blitz.
A few great newspapers will survive. We might even keep calling them newspapers; other terms — cut, paste, and cc — live on in the digital world, beyond their original meaning. But we won’t be able to hold these newspapers in our hands.
When this series runs its course, you can imagine the final episode; the entire cast troops out of the office, with their possessions in boxes, and the doors are locked forever behind them.